档案法规标准2025年第39卷第1期《档案学研究》
全流程视角下档案数字化建设中纠纷的现状与治理路径——以464份裁判文书为研究样本
Current Situation and Governance Path of Disputes in Archives Digitization Construction from the Perspective of Whole Process: Take 464 Judgment Documents as Research Samples
1 东南大学法学院 南京 211189 2 江苏大学法学院 镇江 212013
摘要
对档案数字化建设中发生的纠纷开展实证研究，有助于了解档案数字化建设中的真实司法状况，促进档案数字化建设的合法合规。基于全流程视角，利用464份有关档案数字化建设的裁判文书，分析档案数字化建设的前期、中期、后期所发生的纠纷现状与问题。实证研究发现：法院对“档案不存在”纠纷的处理不规范；承包方转包、分包频繁，由此引发的争议多；承揽方履行质量不高致使档案机构利益受损；档案机构对项目外包的招投标流程不规范；档案数字化利用中的侵权现象需关注。未来应当区分档案、政府信息，确立检索义务标准；规范转包、分包流程，提前防治后续争议；细化合同严格监管，重视档案员工培训；优化档案招标立法，规范招标相关流程；追究行贿案件，综合考虑量刑因素；遵守合理使用制度，管控用户利用行为。
关键词：档案数字化建设裁判文书纠纷
Abstract
An empirical research on the disputes in the construction of archives digitization is helpful to understand the real judicial situation in the archives digitization construction and promote the legal compliance of archives digitization construction. Based on the perspective of the whole process, this paper analyzes the current situation and problems of disputes in the early, middle and late stages of archival digitization construction by using 464 judgment documents about archival digitization construction. The empirical study found that the courts handled the "non-existent archives" disputes irregularly, contractors frequently subcontracted and resubcontracted, leading to more disputes, the contractor's poor performance quality resulted in damage to the interests of archival institutions, the archival institutions did not standardize the bidding process for project outsourcing, and the infringement phenomenon in the digital utilization of archives should be paid attention to. In the future, we should distinguish between archives and government information, and establish the standard of retrieval obligation. Standardize subcontracting and resubcontracting processes to prevent subsequent disputes in advance; implement detailed contract and strict supervision, pay attention to archives staff training; optimize the bidding legislation and standardize the bidding process; at the same time, investigate bribery cases and consider sentencing factors comprehensively; abide by the fair use system and control user utilization behavior.
Key words: archives digitization construction; judgment document; disputes
引用格式
参考文献
