重建档案真实：概念嬗变、澄清与认知进路

[1] [4][32][51] JENKINSON H. A Manual of Archive Administration[M]. London Percy Lund, Humphries & Co Ltd, 1937: 12,12-13,39,66. [2] [62] 白红义, 王嘉怡. 数字时代新闻真实的消解与观念重构[J]. 新闻与写作, 2022(7):14-25. [3] [15][23][36][52] DURANTI L, PATRICIA C F. Encyclopedia of archival science[M]. Lanhm, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015: 35-36, 35-36, 119-122, 47, 223. [4] [13] 胡吉明, 阳巧英. 认知与保障:档案学语境下的“真实性”研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2021(6):41-46. [5] 孙昊. 档案真伪鉴辨论[D]. 武汉: 湖北大学, 2012:9. [6] 洪佳惠. 超越实体:以解释学方法构建的档案客观性[J]. 档案学通讯, 2017(2):31-34. [7] 洪佳惠. 档案:真实之镜[J]. 档案学通讯, 2016(2):81-85. [8] 丁华东. 论档案记忆的真实性和客观性[J]. 档案管理, 2012(6):24-26. [9] 宋新婵, 石秀春. 论档案真实[J]. 档案学研究, 2009(5):17-18. [10] 王燃. 电子文件管理与证据法规则的契合研究[J]. 档案学通讯, 2018(5):51-56. [11] 王玉龙. 不同的记录不同的过去:口述历史档案的兴起及其理论影响[J]. 档案学研究, 2016(5):40-44. [12] [22][26][28][63] EASTWOOD T. What is archival theory and why is it important?[J]. Archivaria, 1994(1):122-130. [13] DURANTI L. Archival science[M]// Marcel Dekker. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1996: 1-19. [14] ACLAND G. Managing the record rather than the relic[J]. Archives & Manuscripts, 1992(1): 57-63. [15] [21] DURANTI L. Diplomatics: new uses for an old science[M]. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press, 1998: 1-27. [16] [20] DURANTI L. Archives as a place[J]. Archives and Manuscripts, 1996(2): 242-255. [17] [53] DURANTI L. Reliability and authenticity: the concepts and their implications[J]. Archivaria, 1995(1):5-10. [18] [29][37][42][44] PETER B. Hirtle. Archival authenticity in a digital age[M]//Council on library and information resources. authenticity in a digital environment. Washington, D. C: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2000: 8-23. [19] TOGNOLI N B, RODRIGUES A C. An analysis of the theoretical and practical application of diplomatics to archival description in knowledge organization[C]// Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference. Ergon Verlag, 2018: 43. [20] [40][43][49][50][54][64] DURANTI L, Rogers C, Thibodeau K. Authenticity[J]. Archives and Records, 2022(2): 188-203. [21] [34] JOHN R. From polders to postmodernism: a concise history of archival theory[M]. Litwin Books, LLC Duluth, Minnesota, 2009: 26, 41-45, 54-55, 68, 145-148. [22] [33] FISHER R. In search of a theory of private archives: the foundational writings of Jenkinson and Schellenberg revisited[J]. Archivaria, 2009(1): 1-24. [23] DURANTI L. The concept of appraisal and archival theory[J]. The american archivist, 1994(2): 328-344. [24] DURANTI L. InterPARES Project[EB/OL]. [2024-02-09]. http://www.interpares.org/ip_director_welcome.cfm. [25] [41] ROGERS C. Virtual authenticity: authenticity of digital records from theory to practice[D]. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 2015: 137-197. [26] 譬如今天为大众所熟知的《静夜思》实际上是李攀龙等明人的改编版,即它不是“原作的”,也不是档案学所说的(身份)“真实的”. [27] Longman dictionary. Authenticity[EB/OL]. [2024-05-05]. https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/authenticity#:-:text=From%20Longman%20Dictionary%20of%20Contemporary,the%20authenticity%20of%20the%20statue. [28] 2023年出版的《档案学概论(第三版)》删除了这一充当总结表述的真实性话语,但除此之外的部分几乎未做任何改动,对真实性的理解仍与旧版一致.因此旧版的真实性话语仍然具备代表性和可比性. [29] CASWELL M. The archive is not an archives: acknowledging the intellectual contributions of archival studies[EB/OL]. [2024-03-16]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7bn4v1fk. [30] HARRIS V. Genres of the trace: memory, archives and trouble[J]. Archives and Manuscripts, 2012(3):147-157. [31] 陈永国. 话语[M]// 赵一凡,张中载,李德恩. 西方文论关键词(第一卷). 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2017:222-230. [32] 白红义. 边界、权威与合法性:中国语境下的新闻职业话语研究[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2018(8):25-48. [33] [60] COOK T. Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts[J]. Archival Science, 2001(1):3-24. [34] YAKEL E. Archival representation[J]. Archival Science, 2003(3): 1-25. [35] 方昀, 潘未梅. InterPARES项目对电子文件可靠性真实性保障的哲学基础和理论基础[J]. 档案学研究, 2013(3):36-40. [36] 毕建新, 邬静娴, 余亚荣, 等. 面向证据效力维护的电子档案可信管理探析[J]. 档案学通讯, 2023(6):78-85.